[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bdf8661-f616-7cd3-b78c-4a00424a0bac@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 13:53:50 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
damien.lemoal@....com, ming.lei@...hat.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, satyat@...gle.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: add initial kdoc over the request_queue
On 2020-06-23 15:03, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> +/**
> + * struct request_queue - block device driver request queue
Since request queues are used as a communication channel between the
block layer core and block drivers and since the block layer core
creates request queues, I propose to leave out the word "driver".
> + * @debugfs_mutex: used to protect access to the @debugfs_dir
> + * @blk_trace: used by blktrace to keep track of setup / tracing
> + * @debugfs_dir: directory created to place debugfs information. This is always
> + * created for make_request and request-based block drivers upon
> + * initialization. blktrace requires for this directory to be created,
> + * and so it will be created on demand if its block driver type does not
> + * create it opon initialization.
> + *
> + * The request_queue is used to manage incoming block layer device driver
> + * requests. We have three main type of block driver types which end up making
> + * use of the request_queue:
"incoming" is correct from the perspective of the block driver but not
from the perspective of the block layer core. How about describing
request queues as a communication channel between the block layer core
and block drivers?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists