lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR04MB4965FD429BA4203694CB37DA86910@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:55:12 +0000
From:   Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>
CC:     "baolin.wang7@...il.com" <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme-pci: Move the sg table allocation/free into
 init/exit_request

On 6/28/20 3:44 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Move the sg table allocation and free into the init_request() and
> exit_request(), instead of allocating sg table when queuing requests,
> which can benefit the IO performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>

The call to sg_init_table() uses blk_rq_nr_phys_segments in 
nvme_map_data() with this patch we are blindly allocating SG table with
NVME_MAX_SEGS, without any performance numbers it is hard to measure the 
impact.

Can you share performance numbers ?

I'm particularly interested in for IOPS/BW/CPU/USAGE/Submission latency 
and completion latency and perf numbers for the respective function in 
to determine the overall impact.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ