[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34a73209-8384-2818-b6e1-c97fc9c32e69@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 10:56:18 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Liu Song <fishland@...yun.com>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
<chao@...nel.org>
CC: <liu.song11@....com.cn>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnecessary judgments in
__insert_free_nid()
On 2020/6/26 22:39, Liu Song via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> From: Liu Song <liu.song11@....com.cn>
>
> The value of state must be equal to FREE_NID, so the if
> condition judgment can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@....com.cn>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 03e24df1c84f..0adeb20f19c9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -2118,8 +2118,7 @@ static int __insert_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, state != i->state);
> nm_i->nid_cnt[state]++;
> - if (state == FREE_NID)
> - list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
> + list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
In previous design, @state allow accepting both FREE_NID and PREALLOC_NID,
If you remove that condition, it's not correct to add free nid entry into
free_nid_list when passing PREALLOC_NID in @state, now, we only pass @state
with FREE_NID, so it's better to remove that parameter directly.
Thanks,
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists