linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 098/131] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200629153502.2494656-99-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:34:29 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 098/131] s390/ptrace: fix setting syscall number

From: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 873e5a763d604c32988c4a78913a8dab3862d2f9 ]

When strace wants to update the syscall number, it sets GPR2
to the desired number and updates the GPR via PTRACE_SETREGSET.
It doesn't update regs->int_code which would cause the old syscall
executed on syscall restart. As we cannot change the ptrace ABI and
don't have a field for the interruption code, check whether the tracee
is in a syscall and the last instruction was svc. In that case assume
that the tracer wants to update the syscall number and copy the GPR2
value to regs->int_code.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
index cd3df5514552c..65fefbf61e1ca 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -325,6 +325,25 @@ static inline void __poke_user_per(struct task_struct *child,
 		child->thread.per_user.end = data;
 }
 
+static void fixup_int_code(struct task_struct *child, addr_t data)
+{
+	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child);
+	int ilc = regs->int_code >> 16;
+	u16 insn;
+
+	if (ilc > 6)
+		return;
+
+	if (ptrace_access_vm(child, regs->psw.addr - (regs->int_code >> 16),
+			&insn, sizeof(insn), FOLL_FORCE) != sizeof(insn))
+		return;
+
+	/* double check that tracee stopped on svc instruction */
+	if ((insn >> 8) != 0xa)
+		return;
+
+	regs->int_code = 0x20000 | (data & 0xffff);
+}
 /*
  * Write a word to the user area of a process at location addr. This
  * operation does have an additional problem compared to peek_user.
@@ -336,7 +355,9 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data)
 	struct user *dummy = NULL;
 	addr_t offset;
 
+
 	if (addr < (addr_t) &dummy->regs.acrs) {
+		struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(child);
 		/*
 		 * psw and gprs are stored on the stack
 		 */
@@ -354,7 +375,11 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data)
 				/* Invalid addressing mode bits */
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		*(addr_t *)((addr_t) &task_pt_regs(child)->psw + addr) = data;
+
+		if (test_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL) &&
+			addr == offsetof(struct user, regs.gprs[2]))
+			fixup_int_code(child, data);
+		*(addr_t *)((addr_t) &regs->psw + addr) = data;
 
 	} else if (addr < (addr_t) (&dummy->regs.orig_gpr2)) {
 		/*
@@ -720,6 +745,10 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct task_struct *child,
 			regs->psw.mask = (regs->psw.mask & ~PSW_MASK_BA) |
 				(__u64)(tmp & PSW32_ADDR_AMODE);
 		} else {
+
+			if (test_pt_regs_flag(regs, PIF_SYSCALL) &&
+				addr == offsetof(struct compat_user, regs.gprs[2]))
+				fixup_int_code(child, data);
 			/* gpr 0-15 */
 			*(__u32*)((addr_t) &regs->psw + addr*2 + 4) = tmp;
 		}
-- 
2.25.1