linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 029/131] tcp: grow window for OOO packets only for SACK flows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200629153502.2494656-30-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:33:20 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 029/131] tcp: grow window for OOO packets only for SACK flows

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 662051215c758ae8545451628816204ed6cd372d ]

Back in 2013, we made a change that broke fast retransmit
for non SACK flows.

Indeed, for these flows, a sender needs to receive three duplicate
ACK before starting fast retransmit. Sending ACK with different
receive window do not count.

Even if enabling SACK is strongly recommended these days,
there still are some cases where it has to be disabled.

Not increasing the window seems better than having to
rely on RTO.

After the fix, following packetdrill test gives :

// Initialize connection
    0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
   +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
   +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
   +0 listen(3, 1) = 0

   +0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,nop,wscale 7>
   +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 8>
   +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 514

   +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4

   +0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// Quick ack
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264

   +0 < . 2001:3001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264

   +0 < . 3001:4001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264

   +0 < . 4001:5001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
    +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264

   +0 < . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// Hole is repaired.
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 5001 win 272

Fixes: 4e4f1fc22681 ("tcp: properly increase rcv_ssthresh for ofo packets")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index ee1b4804b40de..7441ecfc8320a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4528,7 +4528,11 @@ static void tcp_data_queue_ofo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (tcp_ooo_try_coalesce(sk, tp->ooo_last_skb,
 				 skb, &fragstolen)) {
 coalesce_done:
-		tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
+		/* For non sack flows, do not grow window to force DUPACK
+		 * and trigger fast retransmit.
+		 */
+		if (tcp_is_sack(tp))
+			tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
 		kfree_skb_partial(skb, fragstolen);
 		skb = NULL;
 		goto add_sack;
@@ -4612,7 +4616,11 @@ static void tcp_data_queue_ofo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		tcp_sack_new_ofo_skb(sk, seq, end_seq);
 end:
 	if (skb) {
-		tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
+		/* For non sack flows, do not grow window to force DUPACK
+		 * and trigger fast retransmit.
+		 */
+		if (tcp_is_sack(tp))
+			tcp_grow_window(sk, skb);
 		skb_condense(skb);
 		skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1