linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] perf bench numa: fix incorrect NUMA toplogy assumption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a53eedd6ad2fb46aec4d59066277aad7ace470b7.1593445668.git.agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:50:07 +0200
From:   Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf bench numa: fix incorrect NUMA toplogy assumption

The current code assumes that CPUs are evenly spread among
NUMA nodes. That is generally incorrect and leads to failure
on systems that have different NUMA topology.

Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 5797253..5497c74 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -247,12 +247,13 @@ static int is_node_present(int node)
  */
 static bool node_has_cpus(int node)
 {
-	struct bitmask *cpu = numa_allocate_cpumask();
+	struct bitmask *cpumask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	if (cpu && !numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpu)) {
-		for (i = 0; i < cpu->size; i++) {
-			if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpu, i))
+	BUG_ON(cpumask);
+	if (!numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpumask)) {
+		for (i = 0; i < cpumask->size; i++) {
+			if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpumask, i))
 				return true;
 		}
 	}
@@ -288,14 +289,10 @@ static cpu_set_t bind_to_cpu(int target_cpu)
 
 static cpu_set_t bind_to_node(int target_node)
 {
-	int cpus_per_node = g->p.nr_cpus / nr_numa_nodes();
 	cpu_set_t orig_mask, mask;
 	int cpu;
 	int ret;
 
-	BUG_ON(cpus_per_node * nr_numa_nodes() != g->p.nr_cpus);
-	BUG_ON(!cpus_per_node);
-
 	ret = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(orig_mask), &orig_mask);
 	BUG_ON(ret);
 
@@ -305,13 +302,15 @@ static cpu_set_t bind_to_node(int target_node)
 		for (cpu = 0; cpu < g->p.nr_cpus; cpu++)
 			CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
 	} else {
-		int cpu_start = (target_node + 0) * cpus_per_node;
-		int cpu_stop  = (target_node + 1) * cpus_per_node;
-
-		BUG_ON(cpu_stop > g->p.nr_cpus);
+		struct bitmask *cpumask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
 
-		for (cpu = cpu_start; cpu < cpu_stop; cpu++)
-			CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
+		BUG_ON(!cpumask);
+		if (!numa_node_to_cpus(target_node, cpumask)) {
+			for (cpu = 0; cpu < (int)cpumask->size; cpu++) {
+				if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpumask, cpu))
+					CPU_SET(cpu, &mask);
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	ret = sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(mask), &mask);
-- 
1.8.3.1