[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629105222.GF3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:52:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Some atomisp fixes and improvements
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 26 Jun 2020 18:00:21 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> escreveu:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:04:52PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Those patches are meant to improve device detection by the atomisp driver,
> > > relying on ACPI bios when possible.
> > >
> > > It also adds a basis for using ACPI PM, but only if the DSDT tables have
> > > a description about how to turn on the resources needed by the cameras.
> > >
> > > At least on the device I'm using for tests, this is not the case.
> >
> > Is this in your experimental tree?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I'll rebase mine on top and test.
> > After I will send the rest from my series and give a tag to this.
>
> It would be helpful if you could test removing the DMI match table from
> your board. If your device has a DSDT table close to the one I have, the
> new code may be able to get everything from DSDT.
I have checked the atomisp_v5 branch and it doesn't bring any regression to my
case. So, feel free to add
Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
I'll send rebased patches soon.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists