[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629093750.GA1228312@google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:37:50 +0100
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, tkjos@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] cpufreq: Fix locking issues with governors
On Monday 29 Jun 2020 at 13:54:58 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently. The list
> of governors should never be traversed without locking in place. Also we
> must make sure the governor isn't removed while it is still referenced
> by code.
>
> Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Thanks!
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists