[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d43b324fa26638c179650e3c52adbf32@pascalroeleven.nl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:59:02 +0200
From: Pascal Roeleven <dev@...calroeleven.nl>
To: laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm: panel: Add Starry KR070PE2T
Hi Laurent,
Good catch. It's actually the connector type which is wrong. The
connector_type should be DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DPI. If you would include
this in your patch series, you can have my acked-by.
Regards,
Pascal
On 2020-06-28 09:28, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Pascal Roeleven wrote:
>> The KR070PE2T is a 7" panel with a resolution of 800x480.
>>
>> KR070PE2T is the marking present on the ribbon cable. As this panel is
>> probably available under different brands, this marking will catch
>> most devices.
>>
>> As I can't find a datasheet for this panel, the bus_flags are instead
>> from trial-and-error. The flags seem to be common for these kind of
>> panels as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pascal Roeleven <dev@...calroeleven.nl>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 29
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> index e14c14ac6..b3d257257 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> @@ -2842,6 +2842,32 @@ static const struct panel_desc
>> shelly_sca07010_bfn_lnn = {
>> .bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct drm_display_mode starry_kr070pe2t_mode = {
>> + .clock = 33000,
>> + .hdisplay = 800,
>> + .hsync_start = 800 + 209,
>> + .hsync_end = 800 + 209 + 1,
>> + .htotal = 800 + 209 + 1 + 45,
>> + .vdisplay = 480,
>> + .vsync_start = 480 + 22,
>> + .vsync_end = 480 + 22 + 1,
>> + .vtotal = 480 + 22 + 1 + 22,
>> + .vrefresh = 60,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct panel_desc starry_kr070pe2t = {
>> + .modes = &starry_kr070pe2t_mode,
>> + .num_modes = 1,
>> + .bpc = 8,
>> + .size = {
>> + .width = 152,
>> + .height = 86,
>> + },
>> + .bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
>> + .bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_HIGH |
>> DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_NEGEDGE,
>> + .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS,
>
> I'm trying to fix inconsistencies in the panel-simple driver, and this
> caught my eyes. MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 isn't a correct format for
> LVDS panels. MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X7X3_SPWG,
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG or MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_JEIDA
> should be used instead. As I couldn't find documentation for the panel,
> I can't tell which format is correct. Could you please help ?
>
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct drm_display_mode starry_kr122ea0sra_mode = {
>> .clock = 147000,
>> .hdisplay = 1920,
>> @@ -3474,6 +3500,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> platform_of_match[] = {
>> }, {
>> .compatible = "shelly,sca07010-bfn-lnn",
>> .data = &shelly_sca07010_bfn_lnn,
>> + }, {
>> + .compatible = "starry,kr070pe2t",
>> + .data = &starry_kr070pe2t,
>> }, {
>> .compatible = "starry,kr122ea0sra",
>> .data = &starry_kr122ea0sra,
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists