[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6f10db1-7f56-a156-36a1-125e764c8c1a@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:47:51 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] Genericize DW MIPI DSI bridge and add i.MX 6
driver
Hi Adrian,
On 09/06/2020 19:49, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> [Re-submitting to cc dri-devel, sorry about the noise]
>
> Hello all,
>
> v9 cleanly applies on top of latest next-20200609 tree.
>
> v9 does not depend on other patches as the last binding doc has been merged.
>
> All feedback up to this point has been addressed. Specific details in
> individual patch changelogs.
>
> The biggest changes are the deprecation of the Synopsys DW bridge bind()
> API in favor of of_drm_find_bridge() and .attach callbacks, the addition
> of a TODO entry which outlines future planned bridge driver refactorings
> and a reordering of some i.MX 6 patches to appease checkpatch.
>
> The idea behind the TODO is to get this regmap and i.MX 6 driver merged
> and then do the rest of refactorings in-tree because it's easier and the
> refactorings themselves are out-of-scope of this series which is adding
> i.MX 6 support and is quite big already, so please, if there are more
> refactoring ideas, let's add them to the TODO doc. :) I intend to tackle
> those after this series is merged to avoid two complex inter-dependent
> simultaneous series.
This has been around here for a long time and you seem to have addressed all
the reviews.
>
> As always more testing is welcome especially on Rockchip and STM SoCs.
It has been tested on STM, but I'd like a feedback on RK platform before applying
the bridge parts.
Can the imx & stm patches be applied separately ?
Neil
>
> Big thank you to everyone who has contributed to this up to now,
> Adrian
>
> Adrian Ratiu (11):
> drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: add initial regmap infrastructure
> drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: abstract register access using reg_fields
> drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: add dsi v1.01 support
> drm: bridge: dw_mipi_dsi: remove bind/unbind API
> dt-bindings: display: add i.MX6 MIPI DSI host controller doc
> ARM: dts: imx6qdl: add missing mipi dsi properties
> drm: imx: Add i.MX 6 MIPI DSI host platform driver
> drm: stm: dw-mipi-dsi: let the bridge handle the HW version check
> drm: bridge: dw-mipi-dsi: split low power cfg register into fields
> drm: bridge: dw-mipi-dsi: fix bad register field offsets
> Documentation: gpu: todo: Add dw-mipi-dsi consolidation plan
>
> .../display/imx/fsl,mipi-dsi-imx6.yaml | 112 +++
> Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 25 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 8 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 713 ++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dw_mipi_dsi-imx6.c | 399 ++++++++++
> .../gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c | 7 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c | 16 +-
> 10 files changed, 1059 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl,mipi-dsi-imx6.yaml
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dw_mipi_dsi-imx6.c
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists