linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf26168d-bc97-7e35-6f86-a769a36fcc4a@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:51:21 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Add PM support

Hi Prashant,

Thank you for the patch.

On 27/6/20 6:58, Prashant Malani wrote:
> Define basic suspend resume functions for cros-ec-typec. On suspend, we
> simply ensure that any pending port update work is completed, and on
> resume, we re-poll the port state to account for any
> changes/disconnections that might have occurred during suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> index 630170fb2cbe..68f15a47450c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> @@ -725,11 +725,45 @@ static int cros_typec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +
> +static int cros_typec_suspend(struct device *dev)

I'd prefer if you can mark these function as __maybe_unused (to avoid the
compiler warning) rather than wrapping it in a preprocessor conditional, it
makes the code a bit more simple.

> +{
> +	struct cros_typec_data *typec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	cancel_work_sync(&typec->port_work);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cros_typec_resume(struct device *dev)

__maybe_unused ?

> +{
> +	struct cros_typec_data *typec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* Refresh port state. */
> +	schedule_work(&typec->port_work);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops cros_typec_pm_ops = {
> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(cros_typec_suspend, cros_typec_resume)
> +};
> +
> +#define DEV_PM_OPS	(&cros_typec_pm_ops)
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define DEV_PM_OPS	NULL
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */

and remove the ifdefy

> +
>  static struct platform_driver cros_typec_driver = {
>  	.driver	= {
>  		.name = DRV_NAME,
>  		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(cros_typec_acpi_id),
>  		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(cros_typec_of_match),
> +		.pm = DEV_PM_OPS,

		.pm = &cros_typec_pm_ops,

>  	},
>  	.probe = cros_typec_probe,
>  };
> 

Thanks,
 Enric