[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916A4DF80C182319F79BB21F56E0@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:21:46 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com" <oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@...adex.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"yuehaibing@...wei.com" <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 03/10] ARM: imx: Select MXC_CLK for each SoC
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 03/10] ARM: imx: Select MXC_CLK for each SoC
>
> > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 1:54 PM
> >
> > i.MX common clock drivers may support module build, so it is NOT
> > selected by default, for ARCH_MXC ARMv7 platforms, need to select it
> > manually in each SoC to make build pass.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > ---
> > Changes since V2:
> > - manually select the MXC_CLK in each SoC instead of selecting it
> > for ARCH_MXC.
>
> Any reason to do this?
Form the discussion, looks like selecting it for each SoC make more sense, as there is
no CLK_IMX* for i.MX6/7, or am I misunderstanding Stephen's comment? Just use
previous implementation of selecting it once in ARCH_MXC?
Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists