linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa5b0279-32a6-f9c6-f325-cedc2786b74a@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:25:01 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

On 6/29/20 10:21 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 29/06/2020 01:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>   8c9cb6cd9a46 ("io_uring: fix refs underflow in io_iopoll_queue()")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>   Fixes: a1d7c393c47 ("io_uring: enable READ/WRITE to use deferred completions")
> 
> Jens, could you please fix this up after me?
> full hash: a1d7c393c4711a9ce6c239c3ab053a50dc96505a

I don't think that's a grave enough concern to rebase, it's just "missing" a
single digit of the sha.

-- 
Jens Axboe