linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] init.h: Fix the __setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3igMrRNa1oR=d=9A-YNAmb+LXNRbwBk9zuJZq5tfvr9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:58:17 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com" <oleksandr.suvorov@...adex.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@...adex.com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] init.h: Fix the __setup_param() macro for module build

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:40 PM Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] init.h: Fix the __setup_param() macro for
> > module build
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:06 AM Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Keep __setup_param() to use same parameters for both built in and
> > > built as module, it can make the drivers which call it easier when the
> > > drivers can be built in or built as module.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> >
> > I wonder if we should instead drop the __setup() and __setup_param()
> > definitions from the #else block here. This was clearly not used anywhere, and
> > it sounds like any possible user is broken and should be changed to not use
> > __setup() anyway.
> >
>
>
> It makes sense to drop the __setup() and __serup_param() in the #else block,
> just use one definition for all cases, if no one objects, I will remove them in next patch series.

Ok, sounds good. Note that there may be users of the plain __setup() that
just get turned into nops right now. Usually those are already enclosed in
"#ifndef MODULE", but if they are not, then removing the definition would cause
a build error.

Have a look if you can find such instances, and either change the patch to
add the missing "#ifndef MODULE" checks, or just drop the __setup_param()
and leave the __setup() if it gets too complicated.

       Arnd