[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <882baec9-6d8e-55e9-ef67-67266458cbe0@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:27:20 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: js1304@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, kernel-team@....com,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for v5.8 3/3] mm/memory: fix IO cost for anonymous page
On 6/16/20 8:16 AM, js1304@...il.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> With synchronous IO swap device, swap-in is directly handled in fault
> code. Since IO cost notation isn't added there, with synchronous IO swap
> device, LRU balancing could be wrongly biased. Fix it to count it
> in fault code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index bc6a471..3359057 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3143,6 +3143,14 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (err)
> goto out_page;
>
> + /*
> + * XXX: Move to lru_cache_add() when it
> + * supports new vs putback
> + */
> + spin_lock_irq(&page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock);
> + lru_note_cost_page(page);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock);
> +
> lru_cache_add(page);
> swap_readpage(page, true);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists