linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Add memalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629050851.GC1492837@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:08:51 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mm: Add memalloc_nowait

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Similar to memalloc_noio() and memalloc_nofs(), memalloc_nowait()
> guarantees we will not sleep to reclaim memory.  Use it to simplify
> dm-bufio's allocations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-bufio.c    | 30 ++++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/sched.h    |  1 +
>  include/linux/sched/mm.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> index 6d1565021d74..140ada9a2c8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> @@ -412,23 +412,6 @@ static void *alloc_buffer_data(struct dm_bufio_client *c, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  
>  	*data_mode = DATA_MODE_VMALLOC;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * __vmalloc allocates the data pages and auxiliary structures with
> -	 * gfp_flags that were specified, but pagetables are always allocated
> -	 * with GFP_KERNEL, no matter what was specified as gfp_mask.
> -	 *
> -	 * Consequently, we must set per-process flag PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO so that
> -	 * all allocations done by this process (including pagetables) are done
> -	 * as if GFP_NOIO was specified.
> -	 */
> -	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) {
> -		unsigned noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> -		void *ptr = __vmalloc(c->block_size, gfp_mask);
> -
> -		memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> -		return ptr;
> -	}
> -
>  	return __vmalloc(c->block_size, gfp_mask);
>  }
>  
> @@ -866,9 +849,6 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__alloc_buffer_wait_no_callback(struct dm_bufio_client
>  	 * dm-bufio is resistant to allocation failures (it just keeps
>  	 * one buffer reserved in cases all the allocations fail).
>  	 * So set flags to not try too hard:
> -	 *	GFP_NOWAIT: don't wait; if we need to sleep we'll release our
> -	 *		    mutex and wait ourselves.
> -	 *	__GFP_NORETRY: don't retry and rather return failure
>  	 *	__GFP_NOMEMALLOC: don't use emergency reserves
>  	 *	__GFP_NOWARN: don't print a warning in case of failure
>  	 *
> @@ -877,7 +857,9 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__alloc_buffer_wait_no_callback(struct dm_bufio_client
>  	 */
>  	while (1) {
>  		if (dm_bufio_cache_size_latch != 1) {
> -			b = alloc_buffer(c, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +			unsigned nowait_flag = memalloc_nowait_save();
> +			b = alloc_buffer(c, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +			memalloc_nowait_restore(nowait_flag);
>  			if (b)
>  				return b;
>  		}
> @@ -886,8 +868,12 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__alloc_buffer_wait_no_callback(struct dm_bufio_client
>  			return NULL;
>  
>  		if (dm_bufio_cache_size_latch != 1 && !tried_noio_alloc) {
> +			unsigned noio_flag;
> +
>  			dm_bufio_unlock(c);
> -			b = alloc_buffer(c, GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +			noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();

I've read the series twice and I'm still missing the definition of
memalloc_noio_save().

And also it would be nice to have a paragraph about it in
Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst

> +			b = alloc_buffer(c, GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN); +
> memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag); dm_bufio_lock(c); if (b)
>  				return b;
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 90336850e940..b1c2cddd366c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>  #endif
>  	unsigned			memalloc_noio:1;
>  	unsigned			memalloc_nofs:1;
> +	unsigned			memalloc_nowait:1;
>  	unsigned			memalloc_nocma:1;
>  
>  	unsigned long			atomic_flags; /* Flags requiring atomic access. */
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index 6f7b59a848a6..6484569f50df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -179,12 +179,16 @@ static inline bool in_vfork(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  static inline gfp_t current_gfp_context(gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(current->memalloc_noio || current->memalloc_nofs ||
> -		     current->memalloc_nocma)) {
> +		     current->memalloc_nocma) || current->memalloc_nowait) {
>  		/*
> -		 * NOIO implies both NOIO and NOFS and it is a weaker context
> -		 * so always make sure it makes precedence
> +		 * Clearing DIRECT_RECLAIM means we won't get to the point
> +		 * of testing IO or FS, so we don't need to bother clearing
> +		 * them.  noio implies neither IO nor FS and it is a weaker
> +		 * context so always make sure it takes precedence.
>  		 */
> -		if (current->memalloc_noio)
> +		if (current->memalloc_nowait)
> +			flags &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> +		else if (current->memalloc_noio)
>  			flags &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS);
>  		else if (current->memalloc_nofs)
>  			flags &= ~__GFP_FS;
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.