lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200629151818.2493727-125-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:15:57 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 124/265] x86/resctrl: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() static checker warning in rdt_cdp_peer_get()

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit cc5277fe66cf3ad68f41f1c539b2ef0d5e432974 ]

The callers don't expect *d_cdp to be set to an error pointer, they only
check for NULL.  This leads to a static checker warning:

  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c:2648 __init_one_rdt_domain()
  warn: 'd_cdp' could be an error pointer

This would not trigger a bug in this specific case because
__init_one_rdt_domain() calls it with a valid domain that would not have
a negative id and thus not trigger the return of the ERR_PTR(). If this
was a negative domain id then the call to rdt_find_domain() in
domain_add_cpu() would have returned the ERR_PTR() much earlier and the
creation of the domain with an invalid id would have been prevented.

Even though a bug is not triggered currently the right and safe thing to
do is to set the pointer to NULL because that is what can be checked for
when the caller is handling the CDP and non-CDP cases.

Fixes: 52eb74339a62 ("x86/resctrl: Fix rdt_find_domain() return value and checks")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200602193611.GA190851@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index 5a359d9fcc055..29a3878ab3c01 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -1117,6 +1117,7 @@ static int rdt_cdp_peer_get(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d,
 	_d_cdp = rdt_find_domain(_r_cdp, d->id, NULL);
 	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_d_cdp))) {
 		_r_cdp = NULL;
+		_d_cdp = NULL;
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ