linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] driver core: add deferring probe reason to devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:28:42 +0200
From:   Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        andy.shevchenko@...il.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] driver core: add deferring probe reason to
 devices_deferred property

Hi Grygorii,

(...)

>>   /*
>>    * deferred_devs_show() - Show the devices in the deferred probe 
>> pending list.
>>    */
>> @@ -221,7 +241,8 @@ static int deferred_devs_show(struct seq_file *s, 
>> void *data)
>>       mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
>>         list_for_each_entry(curr, &deferred_probe_pending_list, 
>> deferred_probe)
>> -        seq_printf(s, "%s\n", dev_name(curr->device));
>> +        seq_printf(s, "%s\t%s", dev_name(curr->device),
>> +               curr->device->p->deferred_probe_reason ?: "\n");
>>         mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
>>
>
> Sry, may be i missing smth, but shouldn't it be optional
> (CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is probably too generic).
>

I am not sure what exactly are you referring to, but this patch does not 
add new property, it just extends functionality of existing one.


Regards

Andrzej