linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.7 194/265] s390/seccomp: pass syscall arguments via seccomp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200629151818.2493727-195-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:17:07 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 194/265] s390/seccomp: pass syscall arguments via seccomp_data

From: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 664f5f8de825648d1d31f6f5652e3cd117c77b50 ]

Use __secure_computing() and pass the register data via
seccomp_data so secure computing doesn't have to fetch it
again.

Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
index 58faa12542a1b..9eee345568890 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -839,6 +839,9 @@ asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long mask = -1UL;
 
+	if (is_compat_task())
+		mask = 0xffffffff;
+
 	/*
 	 * The sysc_tracesys code in entry.S stored the system
 	 * call number to gprs[2].
@@ -855,17 +858,35 @@ asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
 	/* Do the secure computing check after ptrace. */
-	if (secure_computing()) {
-		/* seccomp failures shouldn't expose any additional code. */
-		return -1;
+	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP))) {
+		struct seccomp_data sd;
+
+		if (is_compat_task()) {
+			sd.instruction_pointer = regs->psw.addr & 0x7fffffff;
+			sd.arch = AUDIT_ARCH_S390;
+		} else {
+			sd.instruction_pointer = regs->psw.addr;
+			sd.arch = AUDIT_ARCH_S390X;
+		}
+
+		sd.nr = regs->gprs[2] & 0xffff;
+		sd.args[0] = regs->orig_gpr2 & mask;
+		sd.args[1] = regs->gprs[3] & mask;
+		sd.args[2] = regs->gprs[4] & mask;
+		sd.args[3] = regs->gprs[5] & mask;
+		sd.args[4] = regs->gprs[6] & mask;
+		sd.args[5] = regs->gprs[7] & mask;
+
+		if (__secure_computing(&sd) == -1)
+			return -1;
 	}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP */
 
 	if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
 		trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->gprs[2]);
 
-	if (is_compat_task())
-		mask = 0xffffffff;
 
 	audit_syscall_entry(regs->gprs[2], regs->orig_gpr2 & mask,
 			    regs->gprs[3] &mask, regs->gprs[4] &mask,
-- 
2.25.1