linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:00:28 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, robdclark@...il.com, robdclark@...omium.org,
        stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alok Chauhan <alokc@...eaurora.org>,
        Akash Asthana <akashast@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
 state


On 6/25/2020 8:55 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits?
>>>>> But you want them split up for some reason?
>>>
>>>> Yes, this will almost certainly be the case, even if not for this patch.
>>>> I brought this up earlier (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11604623/#23428709).
>>>
>>> I'm not really reading any of this stuff for the series as a whole, as
>>> far as I could tell I'd reviewed all my bits and was hoping whatever
>>> random platform stuff needs sorting out was going to be sorted out so I
>>> stopped getting copied on revisions :(
>>
>> Sorry this caused you extra work, I only fully realized this when the series
>> was basically ready to land :(
>>
>> Avoiding unnecessary revision spam is another good reason to not combine
>> technically unrelated patches in a single series.
>>
>> If I notice similar series in the future I'll try to bring it up early.
>>
>>>> For the QSPI patch you could argue to just take it through QCOM since the SPI
>>>> patch of this series goes through this tree, up to you, I just want to make
>>>> sure everybody is on the same page.
>>>
>>> If there are some part of this that don't have a connection with the
>>> rest of the series and should be applied separately please split them
>>> out and send them separately so it's clear what's going on.
>>
>> Rajendra, IIUC you have to re-spin this series anyway, please split it
>> up in self-contained chunks.
> 
> One more thing: when you do the split it seems it would make sense to
> include the DT changes that were initially part of this series
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=278691&state=*)

Sure, I'll send the ones out for which driver changes are already merged/pulled in,
like sdhc, geni-uart and geni-spi.
For the rest, I will include them with the driver changes.

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation