[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f1439be-75c4-3a07-ab7b-f4505bf30c48@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:54:58 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: util: update the kerneldoc for kstrdup_const()
On 28.06.20 19:37, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 17:25 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>
>> Memory allocated with kstrdup_const() must not be passed to regular
>> krealloc() as it is not aware of the possibility of the chunk residing
>> in .rodata. Since there are no potential users of krealloc_const()
>> at the moment, let's just update the doc to make it explicit.
>
> Another option would be to return NULL if it's
> used from krealloc with a pointer into rodata
> ---
> mm/slab_common.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 37d48a56431d..f8b49656171b 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1683,6 +1683,9 @@ static __always_inline void *__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size,
> * @new_size: how many bytes of memory are required.
> * @flags: the type of memory to allocate.
> *
> + * If the object pointed to is in rodata (likely from kstrdup_const)
> + * %NULL is returned.
> + *
> * The contents of the object pointed to are preserved up to the
> * lesser of the new and old sizes. If @p is %NULL, krealloc()
> * behaves exactly like kmalloc(). If @new_size is 0 and @p is not a
> @@ -1694,6 +1697,9 @@ void *krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> {
> void *ret;
>
> + if (unlikely(is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)p)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (unlikely(!new_size)) {
> kfree(p);
> return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
>
Won't we have similar issues if somebody would do a kfree() instead of a
kfree_const()? So I think the original patch makes sense.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists