linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix split view search and debug info navigation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49b32b5e2babdc521a09c4981d03633cc7cb1591.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:58:29 +0300
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix split view search and debug info navigation

On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 16:46 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:23:49 +0300
> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> escreveu:
> 
> > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 11:35 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > This series fixes some issues with search while on split view and fix the
> > > broken hyperlink navigation.
> > > 
> > > The first patches restore the pre-Qt5 conversion behavior. The last
> > > one implements navigation on a different way. I opted to keep this one
> > > in separate, as this one is a new feature.
> > > 
> > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab (5):
> > >   kconfig: qconf: cleanup includes
> > >   kconfig: qconf: ensure that only one item will be highlighted
> > >   kconfig: qconf: make search fully work again on split mode
> > >   kconfig: qconf: make debug links work again
> > >   kconfig: qconf: navigate menus on hyperlinks
> > > 
> > >  scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > >  scripts/kconfig/qconf.h  |  15 ++---
> > >  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > >   
> > I tested the series, and it works really well here.
> > Thanks a lot for the patch 5, I indeed noted that 
> > I am not sure it ever worked like that but it does now, 
> > and it is a very good improvement in terms of usability.
> > 
> > There is still a tiny issue in patch 5 - sometimes already
> > selected items remain selected like it was in the search (now fixed).
> 
> Yeah, I noticed that it was keeping something selected sometimes.
> that's why I sent a followup patch:
> 
> 	Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:57:45 +0200
> 	Subject: [PATCH] kconfig: qconf: re-implement setSelected()
> 
> Not sure why, but this one is not on lore yet.
> 
> > Also I found another bug - clicking on '..' menu doesn't work:
> 
> I don't think that this is a bug. See below.
> 
> > For example select 'input device support', then 'keyboards' on the right,
> > then you can't get back. It also might be something that never worked,
> > and it doesn't bother me, I just note this for reference.
> 
> The logic at:
> 
> 	void ConfigList::mouseReleaseEvent(QMouseEvent* e)
> 
> Which calls:
> 
> 	emit parentSelected();
> 
> event when the "<-" button is pressed. This is used for the
> configList when on singleMode, which makes sense:
> 
> 	connect(configList, SIGNAL(parentSelected()),
> 		SLOT(goBack()));
> 
> There's no connect for menuList. So, this event is silently
> ignored on split mode.
> 
> I guess the main question here is: what kind of action this were
> supposed to do?
> 
> I mean, the "menuView" should always contain the leaf nodes,
> as the rest of the menu hierarchy is at the configView.
> 
> So, what kind of action could be done in this case?

I also find it strange that sometimes the "menuView" (the area on the right)
contains non leaf nodes, but again this is really not an issue for me.

Thanks again for all the fixes!

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

> 
> That's said, when looking into it, I noticed some dead code,
> and some things that could be simplified.
> 
> I'll likely send a cleanup patch removing the dead code.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>