[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629163121.GS37466@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:31:21 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, bcousson@...libre.com,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2
* Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> [200629 12:29]:
> Hi Tony - do you think this series is useful as-is?
>
> Or do you want to see some usage of the seperate conf and mux values
> first?
Hmm to me it seems you should squash patches 2 and 3 together as
otherwise git bisect will fail to boot probably at patch 2.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists