[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629163121.GS37466@atomide.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:31:21 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, bcousson@...libre.com,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] pinctrl: single: support #pinctrl-cells = 2
* Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org> [200629 12:29]:
> Hi Tony - do you think this series is useful as-is?
> 
> Or do you want to see some usage of the seperate conf and mux values
> first?
Hmm to me it seems you should squash patches 2 and 3 together as
otherwise git bisect will fail to boot probably at patch 2.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
