[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWNPAwj0uH1ExGBLe+oFBinX3vPRyA4g2KiwRuc8RExsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:49:38 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] perf tools: Add struct expr_parse_data to keep expr value
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:25 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:04:41PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adding struct expr_parse_data to keep expr value
> > > instead of just simple double pointer, so we can
> > > store more data for ID in following changes.
> >
> > Nit, expr_parse_data sounds a bit like data that is created just at
> > parse time. Perhaps id_data, for data associated with an id?
>
> we should keep the expr prefix, expr_id_data ?
Sounds good to me. Thanks,
Ian
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists