linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of clk_enet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiXJy4ASTNfT+R+qzJ3wA=Wy2h6XZm+8oo09sD+Jmse02w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 09:40:38 -0400
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: imx6plus: enable internal routing of
 clk_enet_ref where possible

Hi Fabio,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:10 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I have tested this series on an imx6qp sabresd and unfortunately, it
> breaks Ethernet as I can no longer get an IP address from the DHCP
> server.

Thank you for testing this out on a different platform !

I had a look at how things are done in the Freescale fork of the kernel
(5.4.24_2.1.0) and I noticed that this kernel has almost the same
behaviour as this proposed patch: the GPR5 bit is _always_ set
on a plus. The code does not check how the enet clock is generated.

https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c?h=rel_imx_5.4.24_2.1.0&id=babac008e5cf168abca1a85bda2e8071ca27a5c0#n269

Now, I'm assuming that the sabresd-plus can run on the Freescale
kernel fork. The GPR5 bit will always be set there.

So why won't mainline work with this patch? What have I overlooked?

I'm sure you've checked that sabresd ethernet works ok on mainline
even without this patch?