[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200629194113.5ppu6fbolvk2ibkj@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:41:13 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when
validating duty cycle
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:45:31AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 6/29/2020 5:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 'dc' here is an unsigned long, thus checking for <0 will always
> > evaluate to false.
> >
> > Fixes the following W=1 warning:
> >
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c:141:35: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> >
> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
> > Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
> > Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
> > Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> And similar to patch #1, DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN now gets unused, so if you
> remove it as well, you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Even without removing DUTY_CYCLE_HIGH_MIN (which might still serve as
documentation):
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists