linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 016/131] apparmor: don't try to replace stale label in ptraceme check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200629153502.2494656-17-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:33:07 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 016/131] apparmor: don't try to replace stale label in ptraceme check

From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit ca3fde5214e1d24f78269b337d3f22afd6bf445e ]

begin_current_label_crit_section() must run in sleepable context because
when label_is_stale() is true, aa_replace_current_label() runs, which uses
prepare_creds(), which can sleep.

Until now, the ptraceme access check (which runs with tasklist_lock held)
violated this rule.

Fixes: b2d09ae449ced ("apparmor: move ptrace checks to using labels")
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 5e32fe434140e..898752b818dc5 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -130,11 +130,11 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
 	struct aa_label *tracer, *tracee;
 	int error;
 
-	tracee = begin_current_label_crit_section();
+	tracee = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
 	tracer = aa_get_task_label(parent);
 	error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
 	aa_put_label(tracer);
-	end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
+	__end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
 
 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.25.1