lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:30:33 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <joraj@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:21 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:43:21 -0700
>
> > If you're not willing to do the work to fix it, I will revert that
> > commit.
>
> Please let me handle this situation instead of making threats, this
> just got reported.
>
> Thank you.
>

Also keep in mind the commit fixed a security issue, since we were
sending on the wire
garbage bytes from the kernel.

We can not simply revert it and hope for the best.

I find quite alarming vendors still use TCP MD5 "for security
reasons", but none of them have contributed to it in linux kernel
since 2018
(Time of the 'buggy patch')

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ