linux-kernel - Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1682267267.17918.1593549591608.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:39:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <joraj@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets

----- On Jun 30, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Eric Dumazet edumazet@...gle.com wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:21 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:43:21 -0700
>>
>> > If you're not willing to do the work to fix it, I will revert that
>> > commit.
>>
>> Please let me handle this situation instead of making threats, this
>> just got reported.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> 
> Also keep in mind the commit fixed a security issue, since we were
> sending on the wire
> garbage bytes from the kernel.
> 
> We can not simply revert it and hope for the best.
> 
> I find quite alarming vendors still use TCP MD5 "for security
> reasons", but none of them have contributed to it in linux kernel
> since 2018
> (Time of the 'buggy patch')

I'm helping a customer increase their contributions and feedback to upstream.
As we can see, they have accumulated some backlog over time.

Clearly reverting a security fix is not acceptable here. Coming up with a
proper ABI-compatible fix should not be out of our reach though.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com