linux-kernel - Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:54:39 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <joraj@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:23 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:17 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> >
> > ----- On Jun 30, 2020, at 4:56 PM, Eric Dumazet edumazet@...gle.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > >> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:39:27 -0700
> > >>
> > >> > The (C) & (B) case are certainly doable.
> > >> >
> > >> > A) case is more complex, I have no idea of breakages of various TCP
> > >> > stacks if a flow got SACK
> > >> > at some point (in 3WHS) but suddenly becomes Reno.
> > >>
> > >> I agree that C and B are the easiest to implement without having to
> > >> add complicated code to handle various negotiated TCP option
> > >> scenerios.
> > >>
> > >> It does seem to be that some entities do A, or did I misread your
> > >> behavioral analysis of various implementations Mathieu?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >
> > > Yes, another question about Mathieu cases is do determine the behavior
> > > of all these stacks vs :
> > > SACK option
> > > TCP TS option.
> >
> > I will ask my customer's networking team to investigate these behaviors,
> > which will allow me to prepare a thorough reply to the questions raised
> > by Eric and David. I expect to have an answer within 2-3 weeks at most.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
>
> Great, I am working on adding back support for (B) & (C) by the end of
> this week.

Note that the security issue (of sending uninit bytes to the wire) has
been independently fixed with [1]

This means syzbot was able to have MD5+TS+SACK  ~6 months ago.

It seems we (linux) do not enable this combination for PASSIVE flows,
(according to tcp_synack_options()),
but  for ACTIVE flows we do nothing special.

So maybe code in tcp_synack_options() should be mirrored to
tcp_syn_options() for consistency.
(disabling TS if  both MD5 and SACK are enabled)

[1]

commit 9424e2e7ad93ffffa88f882c9bc5023570904b55
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 5 10:10:15 2019 -0800

    tcp: md5: fix potential overestimation of TCP option space

    Back in 2008, Adam Langley fixed the corner case of packets for flows
    having all of the following options : MD5 TS SACK

    Since MD5 needs 20 bytes, and TS needs 12 bytes, no sack block
    can be cooked from the remaining 8 bytes.

    tcp_established_options() correctly sets opts->num_sack_blocks
    to zero, but returns 36 instead of 32.

    This means TCP cooks packets with 4 extra bytes at the end
    of options, containing unitialized bytes.

    Fixes: 33ad798c924b ("tcp: options clean up")
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
    Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
    Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
    Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index be6d22b8190fa375074062032105879270af4be5..b184f03d743715ef4b2d166ceae651529be77953
100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -755,8 +755,9 @@ static unsigned int tcp_established_options(struct
sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
                        min_t(unsigned int, eff_sacks,
                              (remaining - TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE_ALIGNED) /
                              TCPOLEN_SACK_PERBLOCK);
-               size += TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE_ALIGNED +
-                       opts->num_sack_blocks * TCPOLEN_SACK_PERBLOCK;
+               if (likely(opts->num_sack_blocks))
+                       size += TCPOLEN_SACK_BASE_ALIGNED +
+                               opts->num_sack_blocks * TCPOLEN_SACK_PERBLOCK;
        }

        return size;