[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db028915-dbad-6989-600a-27d9ea59ba76@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:19:06 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to
add/walk physmem
On 30.06.20 10:17, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> "physmem" in the memblock allocator is somewhat weird: it's not actually
> used for allocation, it's simply information collected during boot, which
> describes the unmodified physical memory map at boot time, without any
> standby/hotplugged memory. It's only used on s390x and is currently the
> only reason s390x keeps using CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK.
>
> Physmem isn't numa aware and current users don't specify any flags. Let's
> hide it from the user, exposing only for_each_physmem(), and simplify. The
> interface for physmem is now really minimalistic:
> - memblock_physmem_add() to add ranges
> - for_each_physmem() / __next_physmem_range() to walk physmem ranges
>
> Don't place it into an __init section and don't discard it without
> CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. As we're reusing __next_mem_range(), remove
> the __meminit notifier to avoid section mismatch warnings once
> CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK is no longer used with
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP.
>
> We can stop setting CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP for s390x next.
(how I hate to spot typos just after I send stuff :) )
s/CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP/CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK/
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists