[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200630102209.1143072-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:22:08 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin " <hpa@...or.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/entry: Use should_resched() in idtentry_exit_cond_resched()
The TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit is inlined on x86 into the preemption counter.
So instead checking the preemption counter against zero via
preempt_count() and later checking the TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit via
need_resched() we could use should_resched() which does both checks in
one go.
The functional difference is that we don't enter the if statement with
preempt_count == 0 and TIF_NEED_RESCHED not set.
Use should_resched() instead need_resched() + preempt_count().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/entry/common.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
index bd3f14175193c..212382f61b8e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
@@ -612,13 +612,12 @@ bool noinstr idtentry_enter_cond_rcu(struct pt_regs *regs)
static void idtentry_exit_cond_resched(struct pt_regs *regs, bool may_sched)
{
- if (may_sched && !preempt_count()) {
+ if (may_sched && should_resched(0)) {
/* Sanity check RCU and thread stack */
rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
- if (need_resched())
- preempt_schedule_irq();
+ preempt_schedule_irq();
}
/* Covers both tracing and lockdep */
trace_hardirqs_on();
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists