[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200630115052.GD23871@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:50:53 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: wait_on_page_bit_common(TASK_KILLABLE, EXCLUSIVE) can miss
wakeup?
On 06/30, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> may be someting like this
or this ...
for (;;) {
int intr = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&q->lock);
if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
/* see the comment in prepare_to_wait_event() */
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
intr = 1;
} else {
if (likely(list_empty(&wait->entry))) {
__add_wait_queue_entry_tail(q, wait);
SetPageWaiters(page);
}
set_current_state(state);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&q->lock);
bit_is_set = test_bit(bit_nr, &page->flags);
if (behavior == DROP)
put_page(page);
if (!bit_is_set) {
if (behavior != EXCLUSIVE)
break;
if (!test_and_set_bit_lock(bit_nr, &page->flags))
break;
}
if (intr) {
ret = -EINTR;
break;
}
io_schedule();
if (behavior == DROP) {
/*
* We can no longer safely access page->flags:
* even if CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE is not enabled,
* there is a risk of waiting forever on a page reused
* for something that keeps it locked indefinitely.
* But best check for -EINTR before breaking.
*/
if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
ret = -EINTR;
break;
}
}
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists