[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200630120900.crhrbdqcqn7illie@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:09:00 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin " <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/entry: Remove `regs' parameter from
idtentry_exit_cond_resched()
On 2020-06-30 13:14:30 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > -static void idtentry_exit_cond_resched(struct pt_regs *regs, bool may_sched)
> > +static void idtentry_exit_cond_resched(bool may_sched)
>
> This is a style question; so far all idtentry_*() functions have regs
> passed. In the lockdep-vs-nmi series I introduce
> idtentry_{enter,exit}_nmi() both having an unused regs argument.
>
> Not sure which way around I feel on this.
Do as you are pleased. I was more attached to the previous patch that to
this one :)
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists