[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM5PR0402MB2756BA362026DAF70E837420886F0@AM5PR0402MB2756.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:40:04 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] xen: introduce xen_vring_use_dma
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > If that is the case, how is it possible that virtio breaks on ARM
> > > > using the default dma_ops? The breakage is not Xen related (except
> > > > that Xen turns dma_ops on). The original message from Peng was:
> > > >
> > > > vring_map_one_sg -> vring_use_dma_api
> > > > -> dma_map_page
> > > > -> __swiotlb_map_page
> > > > ->swiotlb_map_page
> > > > ->__dma_map_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev,
> > > dev_addr)), size, dir);
> > > > However we are using per device dma area for rpmsg, phys_to_virt
> > > > could not return a correct virtual address for virtual address in
> > > > vmalloc area. Then kernel panic.
> > > >
> > > > I must be missing something. Maybe it is because it has to do with
> RPMesg?
> > >
> > > I think it's an RPMesg bug, yes
> >
> > rpmsg bug is another issue, it should not use dma_alloc_coherent for
> > reserved area, and use vmalloc_to_page.
> >
> > Anyway here using dma api will also trigger issue.
>
> Is the stack trace above for the RPMesg issue or for the Trusty issue?
The stack trace you pasted is rpmsg issue.
> If it is the stack trace for RPMesg, can you also post the Trusty stack trace? Or
> are they indentical?
There is no stack dump here. It successfully using swiotlb to do a map,
but we actually no need swiotlb in domu to do the map.
Thanks,
Peng.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists