[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d29e6b5d-da4d-fde3-dd85-80e69bb5e497@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:01:56 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu/drm: Replace "%p" with "%pK"
Am 30.06.20 um 14:14 schrieb Tiezhu Yang:
> On 06/30/2020 04:05 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 30.06.20 um 09:36 schrieb Tiezhu Yang:
>>> When I update the latest kernel, I see the following
>>> "____ptrval____" boot
>>> messages. Use "%pK" instead of "%p" so that the cpu address can be
>>> printed
>>> when the kptr_restrict sysctl is set to 1.
>>>
>>> Both radeon_fence_driver_start_ring() and
>>> amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring()
>>> have this similar issue, fix them.
>>>
>>> [ 1.872600] radeon 0000:01:05.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu
>>> addr 0x0000000048000c00 and cpu addr 0x(____ptrval____)
>>> [ 1.879095] radeon 0000:01:05.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu
>>> addr 0x0000000040056038 and cpu addr 0x(____ptrval____)
>>
>> We can probably just completely drop the CPU address here.
>
> OK, maybe the CPU address is not much useful. If nobody has any
> objections,
> I will send v2 to remove the debug info about CPU address.
The CPU address was useful in the past, but isn't any more. We now have
a debugfs file to read the current fence values.
Please go ahead and send a patch to just remove printing them.
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 5 ++---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>>> index d878fe7..d4d1e8c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
>>> @@ -422,9 +422,8 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring(struct
>>> amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>> ring->fence_drv.irq_type = irq_type;
>>> ring->fence_drv.initialized = true;
>>> - DRM_DEV_DEBUG(adev->dev, "fence driver on ring %s use gpu addr "
>>> - "0x%016llx, cpu addr 0x%p\n", ring->name,
>>> - ring->fence_drv.gpu_addr, ring->fence_drv.cpu_addr);
>>> + DRM_DEV_DEBUG(adev->dev, "fence driver on ring %s use gpu addr
>>> 0x%016llx, cpu addr 0x%pK\n",
>>> + ring->name, ring->fence_drv.gpu_addr,
>>> ring->fence_drv.cpu_addr);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
>>> index 43f2f93..c51b094 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c
>>> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ int radeon_fence_driver_start_ring(struct
>>> radeon_device *rdev, int ring)
>>> }
>>> radeon_fence_write(rdev,
>>> atomic64_read(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq), ring);
>>> rdev->fence_drv[ring].initialized = true;
>>> - dev_info(rdev->dev, "fence driver on ring %d use gpu addr
>>> 0x%016llx and cpu addr 0x%p\n",
>>> + dev_info(rdev->dev, "fence driver on ring %d use gpu addr
>>> 0x%016llx and cpu addr 0x%pK\n",
>>> ring, rdev->fence_drv[ring].gpu_addr,
>>> rdev->fence_drv[ring].cpu_addr);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists