lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200630154326.GT4781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:43:26 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, gorcunov@...il.com,
        hpa@...or.com, alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, like.xu@...ux.intel.com,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out
 intel_pmu_store_lbr

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:20:10AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> -static inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx, struct lbr_entry *lbr)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
>  
> +	if (lbr)
> +		return lbr->from;
> +
>  	rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + idx, val);
>  
>  	return lbr_from_signext_quirk_rd(val);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx)
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx, struct lbr_entry *lbr)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
>  
> +	if (lbr)
> +		return lbr->to;
> +
>  	rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + idx, val);
>  
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 rdlbr_info(unsigned int idx)
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_info(unsigned int idx, struct lbr_entry *lbr)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
>  
> +	if (lbr)
> +		return lbr->info;
> +
>  	rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
>  
>  	return val;

These should probably be __always_inline, just to make sure the compiler
doesn't do anything stupid.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ