lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11e5ee1d-8b5e-2721-091e-ffbf9e1271d1@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:51:45 -0700
From:   James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>
To:     Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
CC:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 5.8-rc1

On 7/1/20 4:24 AM, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:45 AM James Jones <jajones@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> This implies something is trying to use one of the old
>> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifiers with DRM-KMS without
>> first checking whether it is supported by the kernel.  I had tried to
>> force an Xorg+Mesa stack without my userspace patches to hit this error
>> when testing, but must have missed some permutation.  If the stalled
>> Mesa patches go in, this would stop happening of course, but those were
>> held up for a long time in review, and are now waiting on me to make
>> some modifications.
>>
> 
> that's completely irrelevant. If a kernel change breaks userspace,
> it's a kernel bug.

Agreed it is unacceptable to break userspace, but I don't think it's 
irrelevant.  Perhaps the musings on pending userspace patches are.

My intent here was to point out it appears at first glance that 
something isn't behaving as expected in userspace, so fixing this would 
likely require some sort of work-around for broken userspace rather than 
straight-forward fixing of a bug in the kernel logic.  My intent was not 
to shift blame to something besides my code & testing for the 
regression, though I certainly see how it could be interpreted that way.

Regardless, I'm looking in to it.

Thanks,
-James

>> Are you using the modesetting driver in X?  If so, with glamor I
>> presume?  What version of Mesa?  Any distro patches?  Any non-default
>> xorg.conf options that would affect modesetting, your X driver if it
>> isn't modesetting, or glamour?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -James
>>
>> On 6/30/20 4:08 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:06:32PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>> James Jones (4):
>>> ...
>>>>         drm/nouveau/kms: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
>>>
>>> This commit is the first one that breaks Xorg startup for my setup:
>>> GTX 1080 + Dell UP2414Q (4K DP MST monitor).
>>>
>>> I believe this is the crucial part of dmesg (full dmesg is attached):
>>>
>>> [   29.997140] [drm:nouveau_framebuffer_new] Unsupported modifier: 0x300000000000014
>>> [   29.997143] [drm:drm_internal_framebuffer_create] could not create framebuffer
>>> [   29.997145] [drm:drm_ioctl] pid=3393, ret = -22
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ