[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701170928.GE752507@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:09:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: microchip: set the correct number of ports
in dsa_switch
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 07:51:27PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> The number of ports is incorrectly set to the maximum available for a DSA
> switch. Even if the extra ports are not used, this causes some functions
> to be called later, like port_disable() and port_stp_state_set(). If the
> driver doesn't check the port index, it will end up modifying unknown
> registers.
>
> Fixes: b987e98e50ab ("dsa: add DSA switch driver for Microchip KSZ9477")
Hi Codrin
You don't indicate which tree this is for. net-next, or net? It looks
like it fixes a real issue, so it probably should be for net. But
patches to net should be minimal. Is it possible to do the
ds->num_ports = swdev->port_cnt;
without all the other changes? You can then have a refactoring patch
in net-next.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists