[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701182538.GU25523@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:25:38 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...n.linbit.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove dead bdi congestion leftovers
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:57:47PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:41:03PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01 2020 at 5:06am -0400,
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jens,
> > >
> > > we have a lot of bdi congestion related code that is left around without
> > > any use. This series removes it in preparation of sorting out the bdi
> > > lifetime rules properly.
> >
> > I could do some git archeology to see what the fs, mm and block core
> > changes were to stop using bdi congested but a pointer to associated
> > changes (or quick recap) would save me some time.
> >
> > Also, curious to know how back-pressure should be felt back up the IO
> > stack now? (apologies if these are well worn topics, I haven't been
> > tracking this area of development).
>
> It isn't. Jens declared the implementation was broken, and broke it
> more. So we're just living with stupid broken timeouts.
Here's a thread about it. This would have been a discussion topic at
LSFMM2020, but COVID.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190917115824.16990-1-linf@wangsu.com/T/#u
Powered by blists - more mailing lists