[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-718df9bf-f140-4343-80a1-402f89c0c5ba@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: alex@...ti.fr
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, zong.li@...ive.com,
anup@...infault.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alex@...ti.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce sv48 support
On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 01:10:56 PDT (-0700), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
> This patchset implements sv48 support at runtime. The kernel will try to
> boot with 4-level page table and will fallback to 3-level if the HW does not
> support it.
>
> The biggest advantage is that we only have one kernel for 64bit, which
> is way easier to maintain.
>
> Folding the 4th level into a 3-level page table has almost no cost at
> runtime. But as mentioned Palmer, the relocatable code generated is less
> performant.
>
> At the moment, there is no way to build a 3-level page table non-relocatable
> 64bit kernel. We agreed that distributions will use this runtime configuration
> anyway, but Palmer proposed to introduce a new Kconfig, which I will do later
> as sv48 support was asked for 5.8.
Sorry I wasn't clear last time, but this still has the same fundamental issue:
it forces 64-bit kernels to be relocatable, which imposes a performance
penalty. We don't have any hardware that can actually take advantage of sv48,
so I don't want to take anything that penalizes what people are actually using
in order to add a feature people can't use.
I'd be OK taking this if sv48 support simply depended on a relocatable kernel,
as then users who want the faster kernel could still build one. I don't want
to take something that forces all 64-bit kernels to be relocatable.
> Finally, the user can now ask for sv39 explicitly by using the device-tree
> which will reduce memory footprint and reduce the number of memory accesses
> in case of TLB miss.
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Move variable declarations to pgtable.h in patch 5/7 as suggested by Anup
> * Restore mmu-type properties in patch 6 as suggested by Anup
> * Fix unused variable in patch 5 that was used in patch 6
> * Fix SPARSEMEM build (patch 2 was modified so I dropped the Reviewed-by)
> * Applied various Reviewed-by
>
> Alexandre Ghiti (8):
> riscv: Get rid of compile time logic with MAX_EARLY_MAPPING_SIZE
> riscv: Allow to dynamically define VA_BITS
> riscv: Simplify MAXPHYSMEM config
> riscv: Prepare ptdump for vm layout dynamic addresses
> riscv: Implement sv48 support
> riscv: Allow user to downgrade to sv39 when hw supports sv48
> riscv: Use pgtable_l4_enabled to output mmu type in cpuinfo
> riscv: Explicit comment about user virtual address space size
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 34 ++---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 3 +-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/fixmap.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 15 +++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 36 ++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 97 +++++++++++++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 31 ++++-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 6 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 23 ++--
> arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 3 +-
> arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c | 49 +++++--
> 13 files changed, 412 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists