[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6b29c23d867a208a7e4b8c3e71127c078f0b44a.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 20:14:26 +0000
From: Mark Tomlinson <Mark.Tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: "ray.jui@...adcom.com" <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"sbranden@...adcom.com" <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"rjui@...adcom.com" <rjui@...adcom.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp: Set irq handler based on trig type
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 15:26 -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> - u32 trigger_type;
> >
> > - trigger_type = irq_get_trigger_type(d->irq);
> > - if (trigger_type & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
> > - nsp_set_bit(chip, REG, NSP_GPIO_EVENT, gpio, val);
> > + nsp_set_bit(chip, REG, NSP_GPIO_EVENT, gpio, val);
>
>
> I have a question here. I assume writing a bit to this register will
> result in clearing that bit, is that true?
>
> Based on the driver, the 'nsp_gpio_irq_handler' seems to rely on
> 'NSP_GPIO_EVENT' register to figure out which GPIO the interrupt is for.
> And if so, and if this is cleared here that is invoked before the actual
> IRQ handler, how does this work?
It seems that this change masked another issue I was having. However,
the original code is still wrong as using nsp_set_bit() will do a
read/modify/write and clear all events regardless of what gpio is.
I have found another issue, where I'm getting many more edge-triggered
interrupts than I think I should be, so I'll sort that and send a v2 of
this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists