[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200701200951.3603160-4-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 22:09:31 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/23] bpfilter: switch to kernel_write
While pipes don't really need sb_writers projection, __kernel_write is an
interface better kept private, and the additional rw_verify_area does not
hurt here.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c b/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
index c0f0990f30b604..1905e01c3aa9a7 100644
--- a/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
+++ b/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int __bpfilter_process_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
req.len = optlen;
if (!bpfilter_ops.info.pid)
goto out;
- n = __kernel_write(bpfilter_ops.info.pipe_to_umh, &req, sizeof(req),
+ n = kernel_write(bpfilter_ops.info.pipe_to_umh, &req, sizeof(req),
&pos);
if (n != sizeof(req)) {
pr_err("write fail %zd\n", n);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists