[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200701042007.13333-1-xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:20:07 +0800
From: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, xhao@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct
The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
'caps->highest_perf' instead.
Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
if (!max_khz)
max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
mul = max_khz;
- div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+ div = caps->highest_perf;
}
return (u64)perf * mul / div;
}
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
} else {
if (!max_khz)
max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
- mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+ mul = caps->highest_perf;
div = max_khz;
}
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists