linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200701004958.GA473187@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:49:58 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...i.sm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:31:58PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-06-30 12:38, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Assume that BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT is set in flags.  Then where exactly 
> > does blk_queue_enter(q, flags) call blk_pm_request_resume(q)?
> 
> Please take a look at how the *current* implementation of runtime power
> management works. Your question is relevant for the old implementation
> of runtime power management but not for the current implementation.

What do you mean by "current"?  I have been looking at the implementation 
in 5.8-rc3 from Linus's tree.  Should I look somewhere else?

Alan Stern