linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] thermal: core: Add helpers to browse the cdev, tz and governor list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:08:23 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ram Chandrasekar <rkumbako@...eaurora.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] thermal: core: Add helpers to browse the cdev, tz
 and governor list

On 30/06/2020 20:46, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:40 PM Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Daniel,
>>
>> seems that you forgot to cc linux-pm mailing list.
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 17:16 +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:15 PM Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The cdev, tz and governor list, as well as their respective locks
>>>> are
>>>> statically defined in the thermal_core.c file.
>>>>
>>>> In order to give a sane access to these list, like browsing all the
>>>> thermal zones or all the cooling devices, let's define a set of
>>>> helpers where we pass a callback as a parameter to be called for
>>>> each
>>>> thermal entity.
>>>>
>>>> We keep the self-encapsulation and ensure the locks are correctly
>>>> taken when looking at the list.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 51
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> Is the idea to not use thermal_helpers.c from now on? It fits
>>> perfectly with a patch I have to merge all its contents to
>>> thermal_core.c :-)
>>
>> I agree these changes should be in thermal_helper.c
> 
> I was actually serious about killing thermal_helper.c :-)
> 
> What is the reason for those 5-6 functions to live outside
> thermal_core.c? Functions in thermal_helper.c are called by governors
> and drivers, just like the functions in thermal_core.c. I couldn't
> find a pattern.

I propose to move these functions in the thermal_helper.c for now as
requested by Rui. Then you can send a patch to merge thermal_helper.c to
thermal_core.c after and we can comment the move.



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog