[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200701073846.GC301687@localhost>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:38:46 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE()
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:37:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> The patches allow architectures to provide their own implementation of
> __READ_ONCE(). This serves two main purposes:
>
> 1. It finally allows us to remove [smp_]read_barrier_depends() from the
> Linux memory model and make it an implementation detail of the Alpha
> back-end.
And there was much rejoicing. Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists