[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200701074232.13632-1-digetx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:42:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/2] Silence missing-graph error for DRM bridges
Hi!
This small series improves DRM bridges code by silencing a noisy error
coming from of-graph code for the device-trees that are missing a
display bridge graph.
graph: no port node found in ...
One example where this error happens is an older bridge-less DTB used
in conjunction with a newer kernel which has a display controller driver
that supports DRM bridges.
Changelog:
v10:- Corrected doc-comment, unbroke the of_graph_get_next_endpoint() and
improved commit's message in the "add of_graph_is_present()" patch.
Thanks to Laurent Pinchart for spotting the problems!
v9: - These two patches are factored out from [1] in order to ease applying
of the patches.
- The of_graph_presents() is renamed to of_graph_is_present() like it
was requested by Rob Herring in the review comment to [1].
- Added Rob's r-b.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=184102
Dmitry Osipenko (2):
of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
drm/of: Make drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() to check graph's presence
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/of/property.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/of_graph.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
--
2.26.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists