[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4d50b9f-06e8-b6f7-ea5c-7a71f27ae953@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:31:56 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] Silence missing-graph error for DRM bridges
01.07.2020 12:02, Sam Ravnborg пишет:
> Hi Dmitry
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:42:30AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This small series improves DRM bridges code by silencing a noisy error
>> coming from of-graph code for the device-trees that are missing a
>> display bridge graph.
>>
>> graph: no port node found in ...
>>
>> One example where this error happens is an older bridge-less DTB used
>> in conjunction with a newer kernel which has a display controller driver
>> that supports DRM bridges.
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v10:- Corrected doc-comment, unbroke the of_graph_get_next_endpoint() and
>> improved commit's message in the "add of_graph_is_present()" patch.
>> Thanks to Laurent Pinchart for spotting the problems!
>>
>> v9: - These two patches are factored out from [1] in order to ease applying
>> of the patches.
>>
>> - The of_graph_presents() is renamed to of_graph_is_present() like it
>> was requested by Rob Herring in the review comment to [1].
>>
>> - Added Rob's r-b.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=184102
>>
>> Dmitry Osipenko (2):
>> of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
>> drm/of: Make drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() to check graph's presence
>
> Thanks for your patience with these - applied to drm-misc-next now.
Thanks to you and Laurent!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists