[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2134b46-88b5-9260-1b6f-60f5b189e86c@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:43:36 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijuhu@...eaurora.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/cfs: Fix pick_next_entity() implementation error
thanks for your explanation.
you are right. @lest should be used as reference point to compare.
Please ignore this patch.
On 7/1/2020 6:47 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 12:07, Zijun Hu <zijuhu@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> sched_entity @se not static @left should be compared
>> to pick up @cfs_rq->next.
>
> Could you elaborate why ?
>
> left is the leftmost sched_entity and the one that should be used.
>
> se != left means that left should be skipped after a yield and the
> next se in the rbtree is not "far" from left although it has higher
> vruntime
>
> if we finally want to use last or next instead of se, we must ensure
> that they are still not "far" from left otherwise you can promote a
> sched entity that ends up having a really high vruntime
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <zijuhu@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 658aa7a2ae6f..4790f2d851ad 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -4452,13 +4452,13 @@ pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
>> /*
>> * Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
>> */
>> - if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1)
>> + if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, se) < 1)
>> se = cfs_rq->last;
>>
>> /*
>> * Someone really wants this to run. If it's not unfair, run it.
>> */
>> - if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
>> + if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, se) < 1)
>> se = cfs_rq->next;
>>
>> clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists